|Main Subject Pages|
|Finishes & Closures|
|Body & Seams|
|About this site|
HOME: Bottle/Glass Colors
Click here to move directly to this pages "Organization & Structure" summary.
Although color is one of the more obvious and relatively easy to describe attributes of a historic bottle, it is unfortunately of limited utility in classifying a bottle as to age or type. Probably the best discussions on this is from The Parks Canada Glass Glossary by Jones & Sullivan (1989), and is quoted below:
"Because colour is a universal attribute of glass and is convenient for mending and establishing minimal vessel counts, it has been latched onto by some archaeologists as a classification device. Although classification by colour is simple to do, the end result is of little value for the following reasons: colour does not have a direct relation with glass type (the common green, amber, and brown glass colours can occur in soda, potash, and lime glasses; many lead glasses are coloured); colour is not related to the technology of glass object production (i.e., it has nothing to do with whether the glass is free blown, mould blown, pressed, or machine made); colour is only weakly related to the function of the object (almost all colours can be found in all types of objects, an obvious exception being "black" glass which does not occur in tableware). Given these factors there is little justification for using colour as a means of classification. There is a very broad chronology of popularity of various colours over time; however that chronology cannot be applied to individual glass objects with any significant level of meaning..."
Glass Color - How does it occur?
The majority of common bottle glass is "soda-lime glass" which is primarily composed of silica, soda (aka soda-ash) or potash, and lime - the latter two ingredients often referred to as the "alkalies" (Hunter 1950; Toulouse 1969; Munsey 1970). The silica (silica dioxide) typically makes up 60-80+% of the glass composition and is primarily derived from sand. The purer the sand (i.e., the higher the silica concentration and less iron) the better, as it is the other impurities - desired or undesired - that give glass its color. Low iron means more control over the ultimate color (Hunter 1950; Tooley 1953).
Glass which is composed of pure silica (99.9%+) would be colorless glass. However, making glass from pure silica is not practical or commercially viable because of the prohibitive expense of acquiring such in its pure state and the much higher temperatures needed to properly melt. Soda (sodium dioxide) - aka "alkali," "soda-ash," or "potash" in the trade (Trowbridge 1870; New York Herald 1910; Toulouse 1969) - is added to the sand as a "flux" to lower the melting temperature of the silica. Lime (calcium oxide) is added to the batch as a stabilizer since simple glass made from just sand and soda ("water glass") is water soluble making it of little use when formed into a bottle (New York Herald 1910; Tooley 1953; Kendrick 1968; Jones & Sullivan 1989). Broken glass (aka "cullet") on hand from improperly blown, broken or returned bottles was also often added (New York Herald 1910; Toulouse 1969).
From this point in the glass producing process, the final color of the glass is a matter of both controlling off-coloring impurities and achieving the desired color. This is done by adding certain types of compounds to the glass batch in certain quantities. Bottles made from glass with just the basic ingredients (sand, soda & lime) will usually be different shades of green because of the iron impurities in the sand, though other colors can also be attained depending on many factors. So called "natural" colors are those that result "naturally" from the basic ingredients in a glass batch (McKearin & Wilson 1978). In general, with lesser amounts of iron of less oxidation of that iron, shades of bluish to greenish aqua are achieved. With higher amounts of iron or higher oxidation of the iron, darker greens will usually occur (Toulouse 1969a; Jones & Sullivan 1989).
In order to create other colors, the iron needs to be variably neutralized and appropriate colorizing agents/compounds added to achieve the desired color. For instance, cobalt oxide added in proper quantities to a properly prepared glass batch results in a distinctly intense blue as shown in the bottle to the left. In fact, this color is known as "cobalt blue" in the glass manufacturing world (Scholes 1952).
Glass composition formulas were (and probably still are) closely held glassmaker secrets as the experience of extensive trial and error experimentation in glass making was not readily shared with others. Variations in glass color resulted from a myriad of different causes including the strata of the sand source, the mineral in the soil of the of the trees burned to produce "potash" (a "flux" alternative to soda), and many others known and unknown (Toulouse 1969a). Many colorizing compounds work in different ways depending on whether the glass pot environment is oxidizing or reducing (Tooley 1953; Kendrick 1968; Toulouse 1969a).
However, discussing the simple addition of chemical additives makes any discussion of glass making and glass coloring too simplistic. Glass chemistry is a complex science that is beyond the goals of this website and will not be pursued here. For one who wishes to pursue this subject, Tooley's (editor & one of the chapter authors) 1953 book "Hand Book of Glass Manufacture Volume 1 - A book of reference for the plant executive, technologist and engineer" is recommended though long out of print.
In the following color descriptions, the different coloring (and de-coloring) agents or compounds for the different colors are briefly noted. This is just informational because the actual chemistry is of little utility here and glass colors only contribute slightly to the process of dating or typing historic bottles. It is, however, part of the overall "story" of bottles covered by this website.
Having quoted this, color is still an important descriptive element for the recordation and classification of bottles. Bottle colors also warrant coverage here simply because they are of fascinating interest to people. As implied in the quote above, there are some time related trends in color that can be of utility for dating. For example, if one has a colorless (aka "clear") glass bottle which was de-colorized with selenium and/or arsenic, chemicals which result in a subtle "straw" tint visible in the thick parts of the glass, it very likely dates no earlier than World War I (1914-1918) and infrequent in bottles after the early 1950s (Kendrick 1963; Lockhart 2006a & b; empirical observations). The specific "diagnostic utility" of a given color is noted and discussed in the descriptions below.
There are also some colors which where very rarely used for one type of bottle (e.g., cobalt blue for cylinder liquor bottles) but commonly observed in others, e.g., cobalt blue for poison bottles or soda water bottles from the mid-19th century. Thus, some information can sometimes be gleaned from knowing what color is or is not likely to occur in a given category or class of bottles. This may be especially useful in the identification of bottle fragments (Bottle Fragment Identification).
Simply put, people observe or interpret colors (or in Canada and Great Britain - colours) differently. Even the same bottle to the same person can vary widely in color depending on differing lighting situations - direct and indirect sunlight out in the field, fluorescent lights in the office, and LED and incandescent lights at home. Adding to the confusion is the jumble of terminology that is used to describe colors and the seemingly infinite color variations. As noted on Greg Spurgeon's fruit jar oriented website there is no "governing authority" on glass or bottle colors (Spurgeon 2004). (Note: Spurgeon's excellent fruit jar color information webpage is located at the following URL: http://www.hoosierjar.com/colorguide.html.) There always has been and will continue to be confusion as to color nomenclature even though many attempts have been made to try to standardize it. The collector world is rife with unusual naming, like "strawberry puce with apricot overtones" being one example of a lengthy color name which is intended to help clarify the exact color of bottle but can often end up causing more confusion than clarity.
Color names are usually analogous with something that people are familiar with in the natural world like "forest green," "sapphire blue," "amber," "olive green" and so forth (McKearin & Wilson 1978). When describing colors, modifiers can and should be used to help narrow down the specific color. Examples of common modifying terminology (adjectives) include dark or deep (for the denser end of the color), medium (mid range density), light (paler density), as well as clear (for noticeably translucent glass of any color) or murky (glass with diminished clarity). Dual color naming (e.g., olive amber, yellow amber) is a very common and a useful way to describe colors that are shades of a primary color category. For example, "yellow olive" is a dominantly olive color with a shift towards yellow, whereas "olive yellow" would be a dominantly yellow color with a slight, but noticeable, olive tint (Spurgeon 2004).
This author of this website has no delusions of this being the "final" word on colors or color naming. It is considered useful, however, to briefly describe, name, and picture some basic bottle glass colors that are noted on this website. Though this page does not begin to cover every color possible, it does cover those colors that probably make up 95+% of the bottles made during the era covered by this website - the late 18th through mid-20th centuries.
The information on this page is a composite taken from numerous references which are noted where appropriate throughout the text. The most important references were: Scholes (1952); Tooley (1953); Kendrick (1968); Toulouse (1969a); Munsey (1970); McKearin & Wilson (1978); Fike (1987 & 1998); Jones & Sullivan (1989); U. of Utah (1992); Spurgeon (2004); Lockhart 2006a and many other references to a lesser extent.
Colors" Page -
The following glass color description categories are not in any significant order except that the list moves from the generally lighter to darker colors. A user can either click on the color specific links below or just scroll down through the descriptions to find the color that you are interested in or that matches the color of a bottle you are trying to gain information on.
Each color category discussion includes a general summary of how the color was produced, variations within the color category, pictures of bottles (with dating details) showing some of the variations, and an overview of the diagnostic utility of the color for dating and/or typing bottles.
Return to the top of this page.
This color is the actually the absence of any color. Colorless is preferred over the term "clear" or "white" glass since the former term refers more accurately to the transparency of the glass not its color, e.g., "clear green"; the latter term can describe milk glass which is discussed separately below (McKearin & Wilson 1978). Colorless glass was a goal of glass manufacturers for centuries and was difficult to produce because it required the use of virtually impurity-free materials. Venetian glass makers produced their crystallo as early as the 15th century and glass makers in 18th century England made what was known as "flint glass" from virtually pure quartz rock (i.e., calcined flint) which was simply called "flint" (Hunter 1950). Improved chemistry and glass making methods of the late 19th and early 20th century allowed for process efficiencies which made colorless glass easier and cheaper to produce using various additives in the glass mixture. The term flint glass was and still is used somewhat erroneously by glassmakers to describe colorless glass that is made with low iron sand. It is, however, not true flint glass. Flint glass is sometimes called lead glass (and vice versa) though true lead glass is made with lead oxide (Dillon 1958; Toulouse 1969a; McKearin & Wilson 1978). Colorless glass was also called "crown" glass by early glassmakers (Hunter 1950).
Colorless glass is not always, or even usually, absolutely colorless. It will usually have very faint tints of pink or "amethystine" (faintly visible in the base of the bottle to the left), amber or "straw", grayish green, gray, or grayish blue. These faint colors are viewed easiest when looking through the thickest portion of the bottle, i.e., sideways through the base. Colorless glass is usually attained by using the purest sand source possible and by adding "decolorizing agents" to the glass batch to offset the residual iron impurities (Dillon 1958). Common decolorizing agents were manganese dioxide, selenium dioxide (usually in conjunction with cobalt oxide), antimony and arsenious (arsenic) oxide - which is also used as a stabilizer of selenium in decolorizing glass - or some combination of these compounds (Trowbridge 1870; New York Herald 1910; Scholes 1952; Tooley 1953; Lockhart 2006a).
Colorless glass actually does have more utility in dating and typing than most other colors, though still of limited application. Some of the better dating reliability is for bottles with manganese dioxide decolorized glass. Upon exposure to sunlight, this glass will turn a light pink or lavender to moderately dark amethyst or even a deep purple depending on the amount of manganese in the glass mix and amount of ultraviolet (UV) light. This is called "sun-purpled" or "sun colored amethyst " (SCA) glass. The picture to the right shows a Johnson's Chill and Fever Tonic (Savannah, GA.) manufactured ca. 1900-1915. This bottle began its life as colorless glass and has "turned" a much darker than average color of amethyst most likely due to the application of artificial UV light or other artificial source (like sterilization equipment), i.e., an "irradiated bottle" (Kendrick 1968; Lockhart 2006b). The light lavender tint produced by manganese offsets the green tint of the iron impurities in sand creating a largely colorless glass. (For an interesting article on the artificial irradiation of historic bottles, see the late Dr. Cecil Munsey's article available at this link: http://www.sha.org/bottle/pdffiles/munseybottleirradiation.pdf )
By the 15th century, the Venetians apparently discovered that manganese could be used to decolorize glass. Manganese became known as "glassmakers soap" due to the ability to "cleanse" or neutralize the effects of other impurities in the sand, particularly iron (Hunter 1950). Manganese dioxide induced colorless glass was most commonly used from the 1880s to about the end of World War 1. At that time manganese dioxide use was greatly reduced for a variety of reasons, although in part because it did not work as well as other chemical decolorizers (see next paragraph) in the open, continuous glass tanks used by the increasingly dominant bottle making machines - both semi-automatic and automatic. It is often noted in the literature that the reason for the switch from manganese dioxide to other decolorants was due to the cut-off of imports (usually from the Caucasian Mountain region of Russia) to the U. S. due to predation by German submarines during WW1. However, it is more complicated than that with other reasons being wartime allocation of the now scarcer manganese to the more important need for producing steel and the dramatic increase in the application of chemical knowledge to glass manufacturing which lead to the eventual realization that glass batch mixes with selenium as the primary decolorizer simply worked better (Peter Schulz, unpublished manuscript 2014). It should be noted that occasional manganese dioxide decolorized bottles may date as early as the 1820s or as late as the 1930s (McKearin & Wilson 1978; Giarde 1989; Jones & Sullivan 1989; Lockhart 2006a & b), although the large majority of bottles decolorized this way were made between about 1890 and 1920 (empirical observations).
Colorless glass which was decolorized with selenium or arsenic (or typically a combination of the two in conjunction with cobalt oxide) results in a very faint "straw" or amber tint to the thickest portions of the glass (Scholes 1952; Tooley 1953; Lockhart 2006b). The picture to the left shows this color evident in the thick portion of a milk bottle (underneath the line pointing out the valve mark) that dates between 1925 and 1930 based on the makers mark for the Pacific Coast Glass Company (Toulouse 1971). Click Cloverdale Dairy Co. to see the entire bottle which was used by a dairy in eastern Nevada. This colorless "color" can be very diagnostic of a machine-made bottle made from about 1912-1915 to typically no later than the 1950s (Giarde 1989; Lockhart 2006b; empirical observations). The straw tinted colorless glass in bottles does show up frequently in later (1900-1920) mouth-blown bottles although such can be found occasionally in bottles from the mid-19th century. (Click French mustard bottle to view an 1870s era bottle with a faint straw cast - evident at the heel - to the otherwise colorless glass.) Selenium was the best decolorizer for glass made in open glass tanks (versus the earlier closed pots) which was used with most all automatic bottle machines. Like the colorless manganese dioxide glass, selenium decolorized glass will react slightly to UV light which produces or enhances the straw tint (Scholes 1952; Lockhart 2006a & b). Such glass can also be irradiated to produce a medium yellowish brown color which looks abnormal for glass color (empirical observations).
Diagnostic/Dating Utility: Both of the above colorless glass tints can be useful diagnostic tools for an archaeologist who may be dealing with bottle fragments. One can be quite confident that if the fragment is colorless with a slight straw tint, it very likely is from a machine-made bottle, unlikely to date from much prior to World War 1 (i.e., mid-1910s), and could date as late as the mid-20th century (or even later). Conversely, a colorless fragment with a slight amethyst tint is quite likely to date to or prior to World War 1 (1915-1920) and is more likely than not to be from a mouth-blown bottle. Bottles with a grayish tint seem to date between 1915 and 1925, although numerous examples outside that range have been noted by the author (Giarde 1989; empirical observations).
Generally speaking, bottles of colorless glass were relatively uncommon prior to the 1870s but became quite common after the wide spread use of automatic bottle machines in the mid to late 1910s (Kendrick 1968; Toulouse 1969a; Fike 1987; U. of U. 1992). Nothing is absolute in these date range estimates, but they are believed to have reasonably high reliability; other contextual information or evidence should be used also. Be aware that non-glass bottle products (e.g., tableware) does not follow these general dating rules as colorless tableware (plates, cups, vases, etc.) can go back much further than was common for utilitarian bottles (McKearin & McKearin 1941; empirical observations). Keep this in mind if trying to identify glass fragments which may be from bottles or other non-container glassware.
As a side note, crown top soda bottles were generally not decolorized with manganese after 1914, giving a good ending date for such "colorless" bottles with an amethyst (manganese dioxide decolorized) cast to the glass as the beginning of World War 1; most of these type bottles would be mouth-blown (Lockhart 2006a & b). Bill Lockhart's Historical Archaeology journal article from 2006 is available on this website at the link below. This is by far the best reference on the subject!
Lockhart, Bill. 2006b. The Color Purple: Dating Solarized Amethyst Container Glass. Historical Archaeology 40(2):45-56. http://www.sha.org/bottle/pdffiles/TheColorPurpleLockhart2006.pdf
Return to the top of this page.
This color - like all the colors that follow - had many subtle variations and shades. Commonly used descriptive names for aquamarine shade and color variations include blue aqua, green or greenish aqua, pale blue aqua, and so forth. The "gothic" or "cathedral" style pickle bottle (ca. 1870-1880) pictured to the left would be described as deep greenish aqua as it has a distinct light green color to the glass. (Shades of aqua are the most common color for these utilitarian food bottles which were a common stylistic design particularly between the 1850s and 1880s though some examples date before or after that period. See the "Gothic Pickles" section of the Food Bottles & Canning Jars Typology page for more examples.) The term aqua is a preferred (by this website) shorthand version of the term aquamarine. Use of modifying terminology is frequently employed to make more precise the color shape, intensity, or hue. For example, the fruit jar pictured below right would be considered deep blue aqua. (This fruit jar is discussed more on the Food Bottles & Canning Jars typology page.)
Aqua glass is a "natural" result of the iron impurities found in most sands. It is very rare (maybe unknown) that sand does not contain some traces of iron. Sand deposits with very low iron content were - and probably still are - a highly valued commodity. Although good quality sand was plentiful in the Eastern United States, some was still being imported from Belgium for Western American glass factories as late as the 1940s. Aqua glass is the result of sand which is relatively low in the amount of iron which was not off-set by de-colorizing agents as noted in the colorless glass discussion above. Higher levels of iron produce darker greens, black glass, and even amber. Natural aqua glass was often called "green glass," "bottle glass," or "bottle glass green" by glass makers (Kendrick 1968; White 1978).
Different shades of aqua and the related blue-green colors which are often observed in the same bottles blown in the same mold may be explained - at least in part - by the following information quoted from Dr. Julian Toulouse's excellent book A Collector's Manual - Fruit Jars (1969a). This excerpt is making reference to some of the effects - desired or not - that occur when mixing and melting glass. It also points out one of the many complexities inherent in producing desired glass colors:
Diagnostic/Dating Utility: Aqua is a very common color in all types of American made bottles that date prior to the 1930s back at least to 1800 for U.S. made bottles; even earlier for European made bottles though even there, aqua glass bottles were not common prior to about 1750 (McKearin 1970; Van den Bossche 2001). Click 1st or 2nd century Roman aqua "unguentarium bottle" to see such a bottle in aqua glass, though it is so patinated that it is hard to see the actual glass color.
In any event, just about any category of bottles could be and were produced from aqua glass although medicine and bitters bottles, soda/mineral water bottles, ink bottles, and fruit jars are among the most common groups using aqua glass during the period noted above. Aqua bottles became uncommon after the 1920s when colorless glass largely replaced aqua as the color of choice for bottle users wishing their product to be the most visible to the buyer (Miller & McNichol 2002). One significant exception to this dating is soda bottles, e.g., the distinctive greenish aqua of Coca-Cola bottles which was actually desired and known as "Coca-Cola green." Shades of aqua color survived in soda bottles long after the 1920s and is still found today where glass is still utilized for soda containers.
Another notable exception is that many fruit jars were also made well into the the 1930s in aqua though colorless glass probably became the majority color by that time. For example Ball fruit jars were made in a distinct "Ball blue" from at least 1909 until at least the late 1930s and even later for some specialty items (Creswick 1987)). The picture to the above left shows two sizes (quart and pint) of Ball's very popular Perfect Mason fruit jar. This color is light but a more intense blue than blue aqua but does not quite fit the other color groups described below; thus its coverage here. In 1939, the Ball Company was making 54.5% of all the fruit jars in the U.S. and the Perfect Mason was one of their most popular lines (Birmingham 1980). This market domination during the first half of the 20th century explains the commonness of these fruit jars today and in historical sites from the early 1900s through the Great Depression. (These type jars are discussed more on the Food Bottles & Canning Jars typology page.)
Return to the top of this page.
Opaque white glass - commonly called milk glass but sometimes called opal or white glass - was typically produced by the addition of tin or zinc oxide, fluorides (fluorspar), and phosphates (Illinois Glass Co. 1924; Dillon 1958; Kendrick 1968). It was also created by adding calcium and phosphate rich animal horns, bones, and even "bat guano" to the glass batch (Trowbridge 1870; McKearin & Wilson 1978; Jones & Sullivan 1989).
In a sense, milk glass (the preferred term on this website) is like colorless glass in that it is defined by the absence of color, except in this case the bottle is truly not "clear". An interesting feature of most milk glass is that very thin milk glass (i.e., fragment edge) has an orange-ish opalescence when held up to bright light. Milk glass production was also reputedly hard on the longevity of glass melting tanks and pots so was avoided by some glass factories.
Diagnostic/Dating Utility: Milk glass was used in the production of a wide array of different type bottles, though there is some typing and dating utility to the color. The color, however, was most commonly used in cosmetic and toiletry bottles (primarily from the 1870s to about 1920) and ointment/cream jars (1890s to the mid-20th century) (U. of U. 1992).
A typical cosmetic bottle example is the Owl Drug Company lotion (and likely other cosmetic products) bottle above which dates from the around 1895-1910 (Jensen 1967; Fike 1987). Click milk glass Owl Drug with label to see an example with the original label showing that particular bottle contained "rose water" which was a distillate of rose petals - a type of natural perfume. Many of the milk glass druggist style or type bottles (like discussed next) were most likely for that particular druggist's cosmetic products as milk glass was well linked with cosmetics in customers minds (Fike 1987; Cannon 2004).
Another often encountered milk glass bottle is pictured to the right. It is embossed with PROF. I. HUBERT'S /MALVINA LOTION / TOLEDO, OHIO. The bottle is 5" tall, of the "French Square" druggist bottle style (square with beveled corners), mouth-blown with a tooled prescription finish, has single air venting marks on opposite non-mold seam shoulder corners and was blown in a cup-base mold. It is faintly embossed on the base with W. T. & CO. / (undecipherable letter or number); click base view to see such. That was one of many different makers markings used by Whitall, Tatum & Co. (Millville, NJ.) whom operated under that company name from 1857 to 1938 (Toulouse 1970). The noted base marking orientation dates the bottle between about 1880 and 1895 (Lockhart et al. 2006b) which in hand with the noted air venting helps confirm manufacture between those dates. Click more information on Hubert's Malvina Lotion to view the discussion on the "Household Bottles" typology page.
Milk glass was infrequently used for ink bottles, bitters, non-cosmetic medicinals, liquor, and sometimes even fruit and food jars primarily during the late 19th and early 20th century. Milk glass is virtually unknown in the production of soda, mineral water, wine/champagne, and beer bottles. It was rarely used for bottles prior to about 1870, i.e., milk glass bottles/fragments would not commonly be found on historic site's that date totally prior to the 1870s.
An interesting aspect of some milk glass is that it was made with manganese dioxide in the glass batch. This interesting milk glass will react to sunlight - as described in the colorless glass section above - producing a milky lavender color. This has primarily been observed in cold cream and other cosmetic jars from the first couple decades of the 20th century, though it is seen in occasional bottles. It sometimes appears that the lavender color was produced purposefully (with a UV light or radiation) so it is not always possible to differentiate between sun colored and intentionally colored lavender milk glass.
Return to the top of this page.
There are probably more different shades of green to be found in bottles than any other color. It rivals the multitude of amber glass variations which, as noted next below, can grade into various greens. The different greens were formed by a myriad of different coloring agents, impurities, and/or glass making processes. Iron, chromium, and copper all produce different green glass. Chromium oxide will produce yellowish green under oxidizing conditions and emerald green under reducing conditions in the glass furnace (Dillon 1958). (Reducing and oxidizing furnace conditions was briefly discussed earlier in the under aqua glass section.) Combinations such as cobalt (blue) mixed with chromium (green) will, not surprisingly, produce blue-green glass (Kendrick 1968; Munsey 1970).
Just as there were many ways to produce different green glasses, there are endless naming variations for the green colors, e.g., blue-green, clear green, peacock green, jade green, apple-green, emerald green, grass green, citron, etc. As in describing all bottle colors, modifiers are useful in clarifying the specific greens. For example, the flask to the left would be considered a medium blue-green with a slight slant towards the green end. This early American (New England) flask has an eagle motif on one side, a Masonic emblem on the reverse, and was produced ca. 1815-1825 (McKearin & Wilson 1978). (This flask is discussed more on the Liquor & Spirits Bottle typology page.)
The mineral water to the right could be described as medium to dark emerald green. This color is distinctive to mineral water bottles blown at the Congressville (NY) Glassworks and it and some subtle variations are known to collectors as "Congressville" green. This particular Congress & Empire Springs bottle dates from about 1880-1885 as it has a true applied finish but also an earlier mold venting mark on the shoulder on each side of the bottle. This distinctive style of bottle is often referred to as a "Saratoga" style (Tucker 1986). (This bottle is discussed more on the Soda & Mineral Water Bottles typology page.)
"7-up ®" green is a intensely brilliant green or yellow-green color that is associated with the famous soft drink bottle; their plastic bottles still use the color today. The jar to the left is a medium density "7-up®" green and was produced in 1940 based on the information derived from the Owens-Illinois Co. base markings (Toulouse 1971). (This bottle is discussed more on the Medicinal/Chemical/Druggist Bottles typology page.)
The soda/mineral water bottle to the right is in a color that could be described as a deep blue-green with a slant towards the blue end. Compare this color to the medium blue-green (with a slant towards green) flask in the upper left corner of this box. This bottle is from the Cottle, Post & Co. (Portland, OR.) and dates between 1878 and 1880 (Fowler 1975). This bottle was produced during the era when applied finishes dominated, though it has an usual - for the time - tooled finish. It was, however, not blown in an obviously air vented mold like the majority of molded & tooled finish bottles. (This bottle is discussed more on the Soda & Mineral Water Bottles typology page.)
The flask below left has a color that could be described as clear yellow-green or possibly light to medium emerald green. This quart flask is a figured or pictorial Washington-Taylor flask (Philadelphia, PA.) which was likely blown just before or during the American Civil War - late 1850s to early 1860s (McKearin & Wilson 1978). (This flask, which is classified as GI-37 by McKearin & Wilson, is discussed more on the Liquor & Spirits Bottle typology page.)
The bottle just to the left is an example of what some call citron after the color of the fruit of that name. This color is generally a "brilliant greenish yellow" like the pictured bottle though citron is sometimes described as a "brilliant...olive amber with yellow tone" (McKearin & Wilson 1978). Another description would be "pale yellowish green with a slight golden cast" (Spurgeon 2004). The most commonly accepted definition of citron would be the first description above and more or less the color of this bottle. It is embossed with Clement's Tonic (American or Australian) and likely dates between 1885 and 1900. Citron is somewhat of a color bridge between the greens described here and the olive greens described next.
colors and shades of green can be found in just about any type or age of
bottle providing no easily described diagnostic utility to
this category of colors. Some limited observations can be made
-The "Congressville" green illustrated by the Congress Water in the upper right corner is a color that is most often seen on "Saratoga" style mineral water (and some soda water) bottles - primarily from the Eastern seaboard (Tucker 1986). It is a color that was little if any used in the 20th century and only occasionally shows up in other types (non mineral water) of bottles, and then primarily 19th century items.
-Similarly, the blue-green colors shown above are very uncommon on machine-made bottles and generally denote a 19th or very early 20th century manufacture.
Return to the top of this page.
These green colors are distinctly different enough from the greens described above to address separately. There is also some dating and typology utility associated with the olive hues which is covered below. The same green glass coloring agents were generally used to produce these olive colors; see information in the previous section. Usually the olive greens and the related green colors were unavoidable or "natural" colors induced in the glass batch by variable levels of iron oxide naturally found in the sand. These olive colors vary widely and grade into the other greens noted above as well as the amber colors which are discussed next.
There is also a myriad of descriptive names attached to the range of colors that have olive green as a significant component: yellow olive, olive yellow, forest green, olive emerald, pea green, etc. are just some of the variations from the basic olive hue As with other colors, the general degree of density and color can also be described with modifier terms like deep, dark, medium, light, bright, etc.
The unusual shaped bottle to the left in a brilliant olive green is likely a type of sauce bottle dating from around 1860 as the base has a glass-tipped pontil scar. This color could be called olive-emerald green because of the inherent "brilliance" of the glass color. (This likely sauce bottle is discussed more on the Food Bottles & Canning Jars typology page.)
The decorative or figured flask to the right is a medium olive amber in color. This small (1/2 pint) New England made (Keene-Marlboro Street Glass Works, Keene, NH.) sunburst flask was manufactured between 1822 and 1830 and is classified as GVIII-10 by McKearin & Wilson (1978). This typifies an average olive amber color quite well as it is a fairly balanced proportion of both colors. (This flask is discussed more on the Liquor & Spirits Bottle typology page.)
The flask to the left exhibits a rich bright greenish olive color which is often called forest green. Forest green is a color variation that seems to be most commonly found in early (1800-1850) American made bottles and flasks with a color that is shifted more towards the green than the olive. The pictured bottle is a "Pitkin" flask manufactured between 1790 and 1830 (McKearin & Wilson 1978). The term "Pitkin" comes from the Pitkin, Connecticut glass works which is believed to have produced many of these distinctive flasks. However, Pitkin style flasks were produced in a pattern mold using the "German half-post" method by many different glass makers in New England and the upper Mid-West during the early 19th century. The name Pitkin has stuck however as the generic name for all of these flasks (Buckley 1985). (This flask is discussed more on the Liquor & Spirits Bottle typology page.)
The bottle to the right could either be called a moderate olive green or possibly yellowish olive green, as there is a slight leaning towards a yellowish tone. This small, relatively wide mouth bottle is an early American free-blown utility vessel which could have been used for anything from snuff to mustard to medicinals. It likely dates between 1790 and 1820 (McKearin & Wilson 1978). (This utility bottle is discussed more on the Household Bottles (non-food related) typology page.)
The small multi-sided bottle below left is a deep or dark olive amber with more amber than olive in the color. It is an example showing where the olive color begins shifting towards amber. The bottle is an eight-sided "umbrella" ink bottle of early New England manufacturing heritage (1830s to 1850s). The color could also be referred to as dark amber with an olive tone. (This ink bottle is discussed more on the Household Bottles (non-food related) typology page.)
colors and shades of olive greens and olive ambers can be found in a lot of
different types of bottles from different eras. Generally speaking,
olive green and particularly olive amber are colors which were
much more commonly used in the 19th century (and before) than later during the 20th - with
some exception noted below. It is also
associated with certain types of bottles much more than other types.
Thus, there is some
diagnostic bottle typing and dating utility with these colors based on
empirical observations. These of course are trends not absolutes, of
which there are few in the world of historic bottle identification:
-Olive green glass was very uncommon after about 1900 in most types of American made bottles except some liquor bottles (e.g., scotch whisky) and, of course, wine/champagne bottles which still are made in olive green. One observation is that the newer (after about 1920 or so) wine & champagne bottles tend to have a "brighter" olive green than the more subdued olive green prior to that time. This color difference would only be evident with much experience looking at such bottles and is not absolute.
-The olive colors are most commonly found in the following type (age) of bottles: wine/champagne (any age), mineral water (1880s and before - particularly in the "Saratoga" types), ink (1880s and before), snuff (before about 1870), medicinals (1860s and before), beer & ale and all types of liquor (prior to 1910), figured flasks (prior to 1870), and some foods (1880s and before).
-Olive green and olive amber are uncommon colors for soda water bottles after about 1870 (not real common before that), canning jars, medicine bottles after the 1860s, perfume/cologne bottles, druggist bottles during any time period, and poison bottles. (Covill 1971; Wilson 1972; McKearin & Wilson 1978; Zumwalt 1980; Tucker 1986; Odell 2000)
Return to the top of this page.
Bottles in various shades of amber glass were very common during the entire span of time covered by this website - late 18th through mid-20th centuries. Like the greens above, amber colors were produced from the natural impurities in glass (i.e., iron & manganese) as well as from color additives such as nickel, sulfur, black lead and in particular carbon, which was added to the glass batch in the form of coal, charcoal, or even wood chips (New York Herald 1910; Tooley 1953; Dillon 1958; Kendrick 1968).
As with the other major colors noted, there are many amber variations and names for those variations. Commonly used terms include yellow, yellow amber, golden amber, red or reddish amber, honey amber, "old" amber (yellowish amber with a greenish tint), olive amber (covered above), etc. As with the other colors, the general degree of density and color can also be described with modifier terms like deep, dark, medium, light, bright, etc.
The quart beer bottle to the far left above is a typical medium amber color - not too dark and not too light. It is a Buffalo Brewing Company (Sacramento, CA.) bottle that dates between 1890 and 1902. That date range determination for this bottle is discussed on the Finish Types & Styles page; click Finish Types & Styles to review that discussion.
The unusual bottle with an applied handle to the right of the previous bottle above has a color best described as reddish amber; the reddish tint is subtle but distinct in the picture. It is a Wharton's Whiskey (Philadelphia, PA.) that was was blown at the Whitney Glass Works (Glassboro, NJ) around 1860 (McKearin & Wilson 1978). Applied glass handles were an unusual feature added to some fancy liquor bottles primarily during the mid-19th century (1850-1870), though a few were made to at least as late as the 1890s (Wilson & Wilson 1968). (This handled liquor bottle is discussed more on the Liquor & Spirits Bottles Typology page.)
The tall liquor bottle (a "sixth" size) immediately to the right is an example of what collectors call "old" amber. More precisely this could be called a medium yellowish amber with an olive tint, though that makes the name quite a mouthful. This particular "4-piece mold" whiskey/liquor bottle was most likely blown at the San Francisco & Pacific Glass Works (San Francisco, CA.) about 1880 based on diagnostic features (i.e., crudely applied finish, lack of air venting, color). The bottle also has a distinctive eight pointed "star" (like an asterisk) on the base which indicates an almost certain manufacture of that Western glassworks (Zumwalt 1980). Click SF&PGW star mark to view a picture of the base. (This liquor bottle is discussed more on the Liquor & Spirits Bottles Typology page.)
The quart fruit jar to the far right is a very light yellow amber or just yellow, depending on ones interpretation of colors. This is a mouth-blown Globe fruit jar which were first patented in May of 1886 and manufactured from that date probably into the early 1900s (Toulouse 1969a; Leybourne 2002). (This jar is discussed more on the Food Bottles & Canning Jars typology page.)
amber colors were used for an extensive time period in
most types of bottles, there is little dating or typing utility to the
color. However, a few thoughts on amber follow:
Return to the top of this page.
These variably moderate to intense blue colors are usually produced with the addition of the strong coloring agent cobalt oxide to the glass batch. Copper could also produce types of blue glass depending on the batch ingredients and melting pot environment (New York Herald 1910; Tooley 1953).
The various blue color shades and densities give rise to a wide assortment of names, with cobalt blue and sapphire blue being the most common covering the darker and lighter ends of the spectrum, respectively. Dark sapphire is often used to describe medium cobalt blue; light cobalt blue is used to describe dark sapphire blue (McKearin & Wilson 1978). Other descriptive names include: midnight blue (cobalt so dark it appears black without strong back lighting), cornflower blue (pale or very light sapphire), electric blue (a deep brilliant cobalt), and others. However, the usual modifiers with the two main terms (cobalt and sapphire) are sufficient to describe most hues and densities of the "true" blue colors. Blue-green colors were described under the "green" color section above. "Ball blue" - the very distinctive light greenish blue color of 20th century Ball® fruit jars - was discussed in the "aqua" section.
The bottle pictured to the above left would be referred to as a medium cobalt blue. It is an Owl Drug Company bottle (San Francisco, CA. & eventually nationwide) that was produced by the Whitall, Tatum & Company (Millville, NJ) between about 1895 and 1915. These bottles reportedly held granulated citrate of magnesia and/or other products where a wider than average mouth (bore) was useful in dispensing the product. One example observed by the author had a label indicating that that at least some (all?) specifically held "Granular Effervescent Phosphate of Soda" which was a laxative (empirical observations).
The medium sapphire blue bottle to the right is embossed on the front with Crystal / Soda / Water Co. which was in San Francisco, CA. These were almost certainly made at the San Francisco & Pacific Glass Works and date from between 1873 and 1886. The applied finish on this bottle is somewhat of a modified blob with a slightly wider ring near the upper end of the lip. This unusual bottle also has a pedestal base. The actual closure for this bottle was likely a cork and the ring finish a stylistic feature like the base, though this is not known for sure. Some versions of this bottle (not this example) have a hole on opposing sides of the finish in which a metal pin was pushed through to secure the cork (Markota 1994). The reverse side notes that the bottle and/or closure was a result of "Taylor's U.S. PT." (patent) which was "Patented Nov. 12, 1872." Click Crystal Soda Water reverse for a picture of the reverse side of the bottle showing this embossing. (This bottle is discussed more on the Soda & Mineral Water typology page as well as in this article: Crystal Soda Water article (Lindsey 2009.)
Diagnostic/Dating Utility: The presence of the various noted blue colors has limited dating and typing utility because of the wide application of the colors for various products. Though not a common color when compared to aqua, amber, and the greens, cobalt and sapphire blue can be found to some degree in virtually any type of bottle from inks to figured flasks to beer bottles to even occasional food bottles (Covill 1971; Martin 1973; McKearin & Wilson 1978; Zumwalt 1980). These blue colors are somewhat more common in certain classes of bottles like those intended for poisonous substances and cosmetics. An example of the former would be the relatively common early 20th century Owl Drug Company poisons - click Owl poison bottle for an image of an Owl poison. These blue colors were also frequently used with soda and mineral water bottles from the 1840s into the early 1900s and ink bottles from from the 1840s into at least the 1930s (Schmeiser 1970; Covill 1971; Markota 1994; Faulkner & Faulkner 2009).
Return to the top of this page.
Purple, amethyst and red are uncommon colors in bottles but show up with enough frequency to warrant mention. This group of purple to reddish colors were usually a result of glass that was colorized with nickel or manganese oxides and sometimes selenium (Tooley 1953) with true red usually a result of the use of oxide of gold (Hunter 1950). As noted in the colorless glass description above, small amounts of manganese dioxide was used as a decolorizer to offset the iron impurities present in virtually all sands. This colorless glass will variably turn amethyst upon long term exposure to sunlight. With larger concentrations of these substances in the glass batch amethyst to purple glass is purposefully created (Jones & Sullivan 1989).
Because of this color's variability (and popularity with collectors) it is not surprising that there are numerous names for subtle differences in this color theme. They include descriptive words based on real reddish substances like claret, burgundy, red wine, or if tending towards amber, puce which according to Webster's Unabridged Dictionary (1996) is a "dark purplish brown to dark red." The difference between purple and amethyst is subtle, though amethyst is often a "pinker" color than purple. True red colored utilitarian bottles are very unusual and usually referred to as ruby red.
Diagnostic/Dating Utility: These true purple/reddish/amethyst colors (not sun colored amethyst) in bottles are primarily found in the era between the 1840s and early 1880s; they are rarely noted in bottles that date before or after that date range (empirical observations).
The deep reddish amethyst colored bottle in the left corner above is a Mrs. S. A. Allen's World's Hair Restorer (New York) which dates from the 1870s. Hair treatment bottles are one of the few classes of bottles in which the purple/amethyst colors are fairly commonly found. Other classes of bottles where these colors occur with some frequency (though still not commonly) is figured or pictorial flasks, bitters (particular those which are "barrel" shaped like the bottle to the right), and some types of ink bottles. The bottle to the immediate right is an Old Sachem Bitters and Wigwam Tonic (New York) which likely dates 1860-1870. It's color would be described as medium amethyst. (This photo courtesy of Jeff Noordsy Antiques.)
True red - ruby red - utilitarian bottles are only known to the author as having been used for bottling Schlitz™ beer at various times - and in various period beer shapes - from the late 1940s to early 1960s (empirical observations). An image of a Schlitz™ quart stubbie style beer bottle is to the far right just above. Click base view to see such showing the makers mark for the Anchor Hocking Glass Co. who made all of these esthetically colored bottles for Schlitz™. The base photo also shows the "49" date code indicating production in 1949. (Photos from eBay®.)
Return to the top of this page.
Black glass is probably "...the most important of the green glasses..." which "...was of so deep a color as to appear black in reflected light and even in direct light when the walls of the bottles were very thick..." according to McKearin & Wilson (1978:9). This strong and resilient glass was also a color that offered the most protection to the contents from the effects of direct light. Most black glass bottles are actually a very dark olive green or olive amber. These types of black glass were the result of the same impurities or coloring agents as the olive colors, usually high iron concentrations but also other substances including carbon (from various sources including ashes and coal clinkers), copper with iron, and magnesia (Jones & Sullivan 1989; McKearin & Wilson 1978). Occasionally, black glass can be very dark amber ("black amber" - example shown later) or very dark reddish purple ("black amethyst"), although these types are not remotely as common as the olive color shades. When the term "black glass" is used on this site, it is making reference to the very dark olive colors unless noted differently.
Black glass is one of the oldest bottle colors going back historically well beyond the time frames covered by this website - to at least the early 17th century in Europe (Van den Bossche 2001). Black glass beverage bottles (known as "junk bottles" by early glassmakers) and fragments are ubiquitous on historic sites that date prior to 1880 (McKearin & Wilson 1978:229-232). Black glass liquor and ale/beer bottles "...were mass produced as a cheap container between the 1840s and 1880s...in a thousand shapes and sizes" (Wilson & Wilson 1968). There is no measurable line delineating the point where olive green and olive amber become black glass except as noted at the beginning of this section as glass that appears "...black in reflected light..." (McKearin & Wilson 1978).
The accurate dating of late 18th and 19th century black glass containers is difficult for several reasons, most notably for the reason summarized by the following - "As late as 1880 the San Francisco glass houses were turning out (black glass) bottles as crude as those made in the east many years earlier, mainly because of unskilled labor and the inability to retain the workers" (Wilson & Wilson 1968). In mid-19th century frontier California, where transportation costs from the east coast were prohibitive, the local glass makers enjoyed somewhat of a geographic monopoly, especially prior to the completion of the Transcontinental Railroad in May 1869. This protective situation provided little incentive for glass makers to quickly adapt new methods for the production of cheap utilitarian wares such as black glass liquor and ale bottles. This was not the situation on the east coast where glass makers had to fend off cheap imports from Europe, the amount of which flowing into the country was dependent on the level of tariffs and duties at any given time (Davis 1949).
The square, black glass (very dark forest green) bottle to the above left is a Dr. J. Hostetter's / Stomach Bitters (Pittsburgh, PA.) that likely dates from between the late 1850s and mid-1860s. (Note: This bottle is also used as a dating example on the Examples page.) Square bitters, large medicinals, sarsaparillas, and liquor bottles - similar to the Hostetter's and in black glass - were a fairly common item made between the late 1840s and the early 1870s (Switzer 1974; Wilson & Wilson 1968 & 1969).
The black glass (very dark olive amber) liquor or ale bottle to the above right is of early American origin being blown by the New England Glass Bottle Company (Cambridge, Mass.). This company operated between 1827 and 1845 (McKearin & Wilson 1978, Lockhart et al. 2018). The company name is embossed very faintly on the outside edge of the base of this bottle - click NEGBCo base marking to view a picture of the base. This is bottle was made in a three piece Rickett's mold with the middle portion of the base having a sand pontil mark that is typical of that era. (Click Rickett's Firms article to view a comprehensive article on the company and this famous mold patented in 1821.) This bottle is of very thick glass so that it is quite black even when backlit.
The very dark olive or "light" black glass bottle to the left is a snuff bottle that was most likely made in New England in the 1850s, as it has a glass tipped pontil scar on the base, although it was unearthed from an early historic site in Portland, Oregon in the 1960s. This color is transitional between what is called black glass and very dark olive green though appears black in reflected light though not with moderate back lighting shown in the image. These two colors are usually the same actual glass color with the black glass versions being either thicker glass or a denser tone.
Diagnostic/Dating Utility: American made, mouith-blown black glass bottles of any type were uncommon after about 1880, making the presence of this color useful in the dating of archaeological sites (Wilson & Wilson 1968; empirical observations). Even in imported bottles, black glass seems to disappear during the 1890s and those bottles that were earlier made in black glass are lighter in color after that time, i.e., medium olive green or olive amber (empirical observations). However, as previously noted, there is no firm transition point from where the lighter colors end and black glass begins.
The majority of black glass bottles made during the 19th century were for liquor, wine and ale for which protection from the light was considered important in retaining quality. This color is also found in pre-1870s ink bottles (ink bottles, ink wells and bulk inks), mineral waters (particularly the "Saratoga" types), snuff bottles, and some earlier medicinals and rarely for food bottles (McKearin & Wilson 1978, empirical observations).
Most of the dating and typing comments listed for the olive colors earlier on this page hold also for black glass except that black glass was little used in the 20th century for bottled products. This includes wine, champagne, and liquor bottles which - in the 20th century - could be (if olive colored) of fairly dark olive green or olive amber glass but which would not meet the "black in reflected light" definition noted above (Covill 1971; Wilson 1972; McKearin & Wilson 1978; Zumwalt 1980; Tucker 1986; Odell 2000). One notable exception to the last statement are the black amber soda bottles produced for Mission Dry Orange (soda) between 1929 and the mid 1930s. The image to the right above shows an example of these bottles which are discussed in more depth on the Soda & Mineral Water Bottles typology page.
SEARCHING THIS WEBSITE:
To do a word/phrase or image search of this website one must use the following Google search link:
Search the SHA/BLM Historic Glass Bottle Identification & Information Website
(Note: Search results for this website will be just below the final top-of-the-page Google paid ads.)
Return to the top of this page.
This website created and managed by:
Bureau of Land Management (retired) - Klamath Falls, Oregon
Questions? See FAQ #21.
Copyright © 2020 Bill Lindsey. All rights reserved. Viewers are encouraged, for personal or classroom use, to download limited copies of posted material. No material may be copied for commercial purposes. Author reserves the right to update this information as appropriate.